Home Forums Modern Tank Destroyers – Disappointing? Reply To: Tank Destroyers – Disappointing?

#77301
Russell Phillips
Participant

Operations Research conducted in the 1980s demonstrated that dedicated AT weapons (even those identical to tank mounts) are at least twice as effective as tank mounted weapons in destroying enemy armour. Yet NATO was sold the myth that the most effective AT weapon was another tank,

I may be wrong, but I always thought the “best anti-tank weapon is another tank” thing was based on a more holistic view, rather than just the simple effectiveness against armour. A MILAN firing post might be more effective at killing T-64s than a Chieftain, but the Chieftain has other advantages: it’s more mobile, gives arguably better protection (I say arguably because it’s harder to hide a Chieftain ๐Ÿ˜‰ ), and is generally useful, whereas the MILAN is only useful against armour.

Military history author
Website : Twitter : Facebook