13/09/2018 at 21:54 #99282
Hi, I want to make up some fictional designs for my air combat game, it’s going to be 3D printed. The aircraft will be strictly 50s technology like La-15, mig-15, F-84F, Mystere IV, Yak-28. There’s no other limitation except to keep it kind of realistic, nothing too weird like Luftwaffe WWII designs.
I’m looking for maybe 5 designs. We could design by committee or each person work on a single design. Submission could be description or sketch. I’ll ask a series question about specific parts and then post a render, rinse and repeat until we’re happy.
Once it’s done I can give you the STL file of your design in the scale of your choice (1/1250-1/350).
Tired is enough.13/09/2018 at 22:03 #99283
Interested, and I have some 3D design experience (blender and openscad), as well as a printer.13/09/2018 at 22:23 #99286
I was looking for help with working on the looks of the planes and was going to do the 3D models myself. You’re welcome to chip in and make your version of the design briefs.
We might be able to pass files back and forth to make changes? What program do you use?
Tired is enough.14/09/2018 at 00:56 #99289
John D SaltParticipant
The aircraft will be strictly 50s technology like La-15, mig-15, F-84F, Mystere IV, Yak-28. There’s no other limitation except to keep it kind of realistic, nothing too weird like Luftwaffe WWII designs.
Heh. The 1950s are surely the most amply fruitful decade there ever was for weird and bizarre aircraft designs.
Grabbing the copy of the 1955 edition of “The Observer’s Book of Aircraft” from the bookshelf, I cite in evidence:
1. Avro 707B or C — teeny delta.
2. Boulton Paul P.111A — another teeny delta, with nose intake.
3. Chance Vought F7U-3 Cutlass — is it tailless, or a twin tail?
4. Convair F-102A — the classic Dagger, with retractable missiles.
5. Convair GRB-36J Ficon — not your everyday aluminium overcast B-36, but one with an underslung parasite fighter.
6. Convair YF2Y-1 Sea Dart — Delta hydro-ski seaplane fighter.
7. Convair XFY-1 — tail-standing turboprop VTOL fighter.
8. De Havilland DH 110 — twin-boom Sea Vixen prototype.
9. Douglas F4D-1 Skyray — weird composite construction, but a speed record holder.
10. Douglas F3D-2 Skyknight — conventional-looking straight-winged jet fighter, but carrying radar and four Sparrows.
11. English Electric P.1A — Lightning prototype, and even uglier.
12. Folland FO.139 Midge — teensy Gnat forerunner.
13. Fouga C.M.170R Magister — the world’s first basic jet trainer, with the lovely V tail.
14. Gloster Javelin F.(A.W.)1 — the first mark of the Harmonious Dragmaster.
15. Lockheed XFV-1 Salmon — in case one tail-sitting turboprop VTOL fighter wasn’t enough.
16. MiG 15 — the classic MiG shape, the soldier-aircraft.
17. North American F-86D Sabre — the Sabre-Dog, complete with shoot-you-in-the-face unguided air-to-air rockets.
18. SAAB J29F — the flying barrel.
19. Sud-Est S.E.5000 Baroudeur — trolley-launched swept-wing jet fighter.
20. Sud-Ouest S.O. 9000 Trident — jet pods on the wing tips.
You might get weirder designs after a drunken lobster dinner with Heath Robinson, but it won’t be easy.
All the best,
John.14/09/2018 at 11:46 #99322
Yeah, too many weirdness in the 50s.
So, Roger want to start designing?
Tired is enough.17/09/2018 at 18:04 #99601
Sorry, thought I’d subscribed to this. OpenSCAD and Blender mostly.
Do you have some design briefs? I.e. when someone went to the bureau and asked for an aircraft design, what did it need to do? Dogfighter, missile first stage like an F-104, etc.? Otherwise I might start looking at the Avro 730…18/09/2018 at 10:46 #99652
What I had in mind were single seat fighters or light fighters. I figured they’d be easier to do than more complex/larger aircraft.
More detailed description
Single or two engine
No radar (initially)
Land based or carrier based conventional takeoff
Tired is enough.18/09/2018 at 19:52 #99696
de Havilland Vampire, but with single engine in body (much like the Yak-15?) and swept wings?
F-84 or even Mig-15 with a V-tail?
Maybe a jet version of the J7W Shinden or 1950’s version of the Curtiss-Wright XP55 Ascender? Or is that to 1940’s?
"I saw this in a cartoon once, but I'm pretty sure I can do it..."19/09/2018 at 08:18 #99723
The Japanese were ahead of us with the jet J7W. The Yak-15 redan layout is interesting, any idea on how I can make the fuselage more unique?
- This reply was modified 5 months ago by Thomaston.
Tired is enough.19/09/2018 at 21:11 #99767
Maybe move the wings to be low instead of mid-set? Or perhaps give it a Mig-21 style canopy spine?
"I saw this in a cartoon once, but I'm pretty sure I can do it..."20/09/2018 at 00:19 #99776
Check out the Nazi experimental designs at http://www.luft46.com/. They’re what I imagine the air war in Europe would have looked like if we hadn’t won in 1945, and things dragged on. They have a very “Early 50’s” first-generation look to them. Just food for thought.20/09/2018 at 16:44 #99819
The one to the right is beginning to look good to me. It’s also looking like one of the Luftwaffe’s design, but then against what early jet doesn’t. How about the wings, tail and horizontal stab?
Tired is enough.20/09/2018 at 20:32 #99832
It does look pretty good! Don’t recall if there is a V tail that looks similar, but that might be different. Or perhaps bringing the forward bases of the VS and HS forwards some to give them deeper triangles?
"I saw this in a cartoon once, but I'm pretty sure I can do it..."20/09/2018 at 23:38 #99843
Went back and played with the wing position again and Design A high wing looks pretty menacing. The spine looks quite good and help differentiate it from Luftwaffe designs. I might put the missiles on Design B further out to middle of wing.
Any changes or refinements?
Design A (low, mid, high) Design B
Tired is enough.21/09/2018 at 02:33 #9985221/09/2018 at 15:14 #99877
Oh yes, high-wing design A looks fantastic!
For some reason I’m just not buying design B as much. Has a sort of cartoony look (which I actually like, but may not be good for this usage?). I think moving the HS to the top of the tail, maybe with a little bit of a dihedral might change it up enough.
"I saw this in a cartoon once, but I'm pretty sure I can do it..."21/09/2018 at 18:07 #99887
Krasnynorad and Azurnerreich? Are these imaginations?
Made the planes more realistically proportioned and Design B a little smaller.
If design A is all good I’ll need a name for it.
Tired is enough.21/09/2018 at 19:36 #9989324/09/2018 at 21:41 #100071
Anyone want the STL file for these just give me the wing span you want and I’ll scaled them.
Tired is enough.29/10/2018 at 18:58 #102729
Man I wish I had my own printer!
"I saw this in a cartoon once, but I'm pretty sure I can do it..."
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.