KR 16 new edition

[Angel Barracks]

I am going to re-do KR 16.
There will be the rulebook, the background book, the scenario book and then two handbooks.
The RDF handbook and the Junker Insurgent handbook.

I am wondering what style of image people prefer for illustrations of rules.
Do you prefer the infantry models on a white background when illustrating mechanics, or do you prefer them on a table top background.
White may be easier to follow, but on a table top may look cooler?

[Rules Junkie Jim]

So long as it’s a clear picture, the tabletop’s probably better…  any rules changes??

[Thaddeus Blanchette]

I ALWAYS enjoy your KR16 vignettes, so I say go with those. They are eye-grabbing and flavourful.

We get slapped around, but we have a good time!

[Angel Barracks]

Rules Junkie Jim wrote:

any rules changes??

Not that I can think of.
Just clearing up some points and making the layout a bit prettier.

All troop specific rules will be in the handbooks.
Things like proximity mines, the RDF resonator, cavalry rules, insurgent rules, etc.

I will be adding into the main rules the campaign system and a few other odds and sods.

Just about making a bit neater, more pretty and so on.
The game and world has come on a fair bit since it first came out over 2 years ago.

[Angel Barracks]

So like this is ok?

Thinking more about the squad in cohesion.

[Angel Barracks]

Which cover do you prefer?

[Rules Junkie Jim]

Angel Barracks wrote:

So like this is ok?

Looks grand!

Think I prefer the first cover.

[Mr. Average]

Definitely prefer the little tabletop vignettes.  Your buildings and terrain are the biggest selling point of the system – they show how visually appealing the scale can really be.

Coverwise, I like options 1 and 2.  At some point, we should talk about illustrations, you and me.

[Author]

Posts