- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 months, 1 week ago by
Whirlwind.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
-
AuthorPosts
-
07/10/2022 at 16:58 #178809
John D Salt
ParticipantI have been trying to clear some of the accumulated rubbish out of the kitchen, much of which is paper. One item swept up during the great clearing of the worktop was a notebook incuding a couple of snippets from National Archive visits many years ago. As I have just typed these up, I see no good reason not to inflict them on a wider public, as there are perhaps two or three people here who share my fascination with the phenomenon of armour penetration.
– – – – – – – – – – cut here – – – – – – – – –
DEFE 15/367 “Effect on armour penetration of firing cores of different densities”, July 1947 An ARDE report on 20-pounder APDS penetration performance. Property Imperial SI Core weight 4.7 lbs 2.134 kg Core diameter 1.6 ins 40.64 mm Round weight 8.424 lbs 3.824 kg Propelling charge weight 10 oz 12 drs 0.305 kg Core density 14 g/cm3 Sub-projectile diameter 2.08 ins 52.83 mm Muzzle velocity 4 650 ft/s 1 417 m/s Penetration at 30º for core density 14: Range (yds) Range (m) Penetration (mm) 0 0 303 500 457 287 1 000 914 271 1 500 1 372 255 2 000 1 829 240 2 500 2 286 225 Add or subtract 10mm per unit density between 13.0 and 15.5. DEFE 15/709 “Theory of armour penetration by tungsten carbide shot and the effect of headshape on performance at high velocities”, 1945 “In plate at least 8 calibres thick the actual resisting pressure rises to this same maximum some four calibres from the front surface, and maintains it until some two calibres from the back surface.” The maximum referred to is the pressure at which penetration occurs by punching a cylindrical plug, rather than ductile hole enlargement. The following figures are taken from a graph by eye, and show the mean resistive pressure of homogenous armour for different thickness/diameter ratios: t/d ratio tons/sq. in. megapascals 3 202 3 120 4 220 3 398 5 234 3 614 6 247 3 815 7 258 3 985 8 267 4 124
– – – – – – – – – – cut here – – – – – – – – –
All the best,
John.
13/12/2022 at 16:59 #181108Whirlwind
Participantthanks for putting that up, John
-
AuthorPosts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.