Home › Forums › Horse and Musket › General Horse and Musket › Why didn't the Zulus use bows?
- This topic has 22 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 3 months ago by
grizzlymc.
-
AuthorPosts
-
06/08/2014 at 19:55 #3592
General Slade
ParticipantThis is probably a stupid question (but hey, it’s not the first I have asked and I don’t suppose it will be the last): Why didn’t the Zulus use bows? Or slings for that matter?
It’s one of those things I have never thought about before but I was considering putting together a Zulu-style army for an ancient/medieval fantasy campaign and it occurred to me that they would be seriously lacking on the missile front. I assume there would have been some trade in guns even before the Zulu war but I can’t help feel a bit more firepower wouldn’t have done them any harm.
Or am I missing something obvious?
06/08/2014 at 20:48 #3599Not Connard Sage
ParticipantNot many suitable trees on the veldt…
Obvious contrarian and passive aggressive old prat, who is taken far too seriously by some and not seriously enough by others.
06/08/2014 at 21:01 #3600General Slade
ParticipantI’ll buy that. Now of course I’m wondering what kind of trees they made their spear shafts from?
I’ve got a bad feeling I might end up having to read a book or something …
06/08/2014 at 21:13 #3603Not Connard Sage
ParticipantA spear shaft doesn’t need the properties of a bowstave. 😉
Obvious contrarian and passive aggressive old prat, who is taken far too seriously by some and not seriously enough by others.
06/08/2014 at 21:16 #3604General Slade
ParticipantGood point. What about slings? They don’t grow on trees.
06/08/2014 at 21:20 #3606Not Connard Sage
ParticipantDunno about that one. No shortage of cow hide to make them out of.
Obvious contrarian and passive aggressive old prat, who is taken far too seriously by some and not seriously enough by others.
07/08/2014 at 05:19 #3652Truscott Trotter
ParticipantGood point. What about slings? They don’t grow on trees.
Shortage of rocks?
I suspect it was not considered manly to kill an enemy unless you did it face to face….pity for the Zulus the Brits did not share that veiw07/08/2014 at 08:45 #3666warren coleman
ParticipantGeneral,
I have also looked at a Zulu/Dark Africa army for my fantasy gaming world, if you make them an ’empire’, you can use tribes from the north and indeed pigmees which did use bow and even blow pipes.
Black Hat do a fantastic range of various tribes with headdress and shield variants, visually great!
07/08/2014 at 10:13 #3683General Slade
ParticipantHello Truscott,
I think you might be on to something with that. Last night while I was painting I listened to an old In Our Time radio programme about the Zulu nation’s rise and fall and it said before the Zulus started to build their empire warfare in the region was quite ritualistic, designed to prove the bravery of a warrior, so I guess that would help to explain why missile weapons might be frowned upon.
Hi Warren,
I had a look on the Black Hat website and I couldn’t see any Zulus.Which range are they in? I’m planning to get them in 15mm so I will probably just use Minifigs (I use them for everything else so why change the habits of a lifetime!). I won’t be using them as Zulus as such so I will be able to add some bows and slings if I can finds some figures that don’t look out of place next to them. In fact I’ll probably also have a king riding on an elephant because I like elephants.
07/08/2014 at 10:36 #3687Blackhat
ParticipantHi Warren, I had a look on the Black Hat website and I couldn’t see any Zulus.Which range are they in?
Hi
They are in the colonial range here:
07/08/2014 at 10:48 #3689General Slade
ParticipantThanks Blackhat,
I’ll take a look.
You’d think it might have occurred to me to look in the colonial range in the first place . . .
08/08/2014 at 08:42 #3810Will McNally
ParticipantZulus are pastoralists not hunter/gathers hence no need for bows/slings, any firearms would be a status symbol
08/08/2014 at 10:38 #3822General Slade
ParticipantThanks Will. Since asking the question I have done a bit of reading up on the subject and it seems that the neighbouring tribes mainly fought with light javelins, which don’t sound as if they were particularly effective, and the Zulus aimed to close to melee as fast as possible, so there wasn’t any real need for long range missile fire.
Another point I really need to bear in mind when thinking about these things is that the Zulus weren’t looking at DBA army lists, browsing through everyone from the Sumerians to the Burgundian Ordonnance and thinking maybe we should balance our force out with some psiloi . . .
12/08/2014 at 15:44 #4142ExtraCrispy
ParticipantAlso, I think the range you’re looking for is actually Blue Moon – they do a lot of different tribes each with multiple shield options. Not that the Black Hat aren’t nice (I sell both in my shop).
12/08/2014 at 16:15 #4146General Slade
ParticipantI’m really not keen on Blue Moon figures. I admit I haven’t seen them in the flesh but I have checked out the pictures of them and the shafts of the weapons are a bit thick for my taste. Also, the faces just don’t look very African to me. But it may be that the photos don’t do them justice.
14/08/2014 at 08:32 #4379Patrice
ParticipantThey were excellent warriors without bows so you certainly can play them very well without bows too
They had metalworking and other skills but not on the same level of technology and training than Ancient or Medieval armies. Native bows used by other people (African or American) were perhaps effective at very close range but nothing to compare with the Ancient/Medieval bows used for war. Ancient slings were effective with lead bullets and for shooting at large enemy groups.
http://www.argad-bzh.fr/argad/en.html
https://www.anargader.net/14/08/2014 at 14:25 #4448Not Connard Sage
ParticipantI’m really not keen on Blue Moon figures. I admit I haven’t seen them in the flesh but I have checked out the pictures of them and the shafts of the weapons are a bit thick for my taste. Also, the faces just don’t look very African to me. But it may be that the photos don’t do them justice.
Essex Zulus are probably one of their best 15mm ranges, with multiple poses within each pack. Except for one thing – separate spears and shields (or is that two things?).
I have over 400 of the buggers. All I can say is, never again 😀
Obvious contrarian and passive aggressive old prat, who is taken far too seriously by some and not seriously enough by others.
14/08/2014 at 18:13 #4464General Slade
ParticipantI checked out the Essex Zulus and they do look nice. Can’t stay I’d fancy gluing the shields and spears on 400 of them though. You’re a braver man than me. Did the words “Zulus – thousands of ’em!” just keep going through your head over and over again?
28/08/2014 at 03:17 #6089grizzlymc
ParticipantWhat Nall McWilly said. The zulu had no need for missile power, they were doinant in hand to hand. Their warrior culture was not too hidebound as they did try to adopt firearms, but the british struck too quicky for them to adapt.
28/08/2014 at 07:26 #6097Not Connard Sage
ParticipantI checked out the Essex Zulus and they do look nice. Can’t stay I’d fancy gluing the shields and spears on 400 of them though. You’re a braver man than me. Did the words “Zulus – thousands of ‘em!” just keep going through your head over and over again?
Yes
Obvious contrarian and passive aggressive old prat, who is taken far too seriously by some and not seriously enough by others.
29/08/2014 at 17:36 #6357grizzlymc
ParticipantHello not sage!
29/08/2014 at 17:40 #6358Not Connard Sage
ParticipantHi Grizz. How you doin’?
Obvious contrarian and passive aggressive old prat, who is taken far too seriously by some and not seriously enough by others.
29/08/2014 at 22:13 #6404grizzlymc
ParticipantTrying not to look at Baccus zulus, farsands of em!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.