Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fury #11524
    Jurgen Leistner
    Participant

    It is not released here until 1st January 2015; perhaps I will go up to Denmark to see it as it is released there in two weeks, unless they put it all in Jens language.

    in reply to: Panzer IV 44, 45 Just Dark Yellow? #11347
    Jurgen Leistner
    Participant

    Tim,

    You might find this useful as it explains the various stages of German tank camouflage painting:

    http://www.panzerworld.com/german-armor-camouflage

    in reply to: Recommend me a documentary #4877
    Jurgen Leistner
    Participant

    If you can find it:

    1983: The Brink Of Apocalypse

    Really, really scary!

     

    Jurgen

     

    in reply to: Medics in western armies? #4496
    Jurgen Leistner
    Participant

    Geoff,

    My Chinese have a medic figure, because Empress make one; my Bundeswehr, Soviet and British just have normal figures, with one designated as a medic for the game.  My PMC figures do not have medics:).

    Jurgen

    in reply to: Vehicles in Skrimish Sangin? #4118
    Jurgen Leistner
    Participant

    Skirmish Sangin works fine for actions between two modern forces.

    Jurgen

     

     

     

    in reply to: Want to help test some rules? #3868
    Jurgen Leistner
    Participant

    Ivan,

    You have mail; I have a very interesting group of playtesters for you.

    Jurgen

    in reply to: Medics in western armies? #3696
    Jurgen Leistner
    Participant

    Ivan,

    I am not sure about other Western armies but for Bundeswehr Panzergrenadier units, a medic is attached at the Zug (platoon) level.  However, all of the soldiers are, of course, trained to give emergency aid.

    Jurgen

    in reply to: Suppression effects in infantry games #3596
    Jurgen Leistner
    Participant

    James,

    Troops might be able to get up and move off after an artillery bombardment but they also might not;  being under artillery fire is very stressful, especially if it is sustained for any length of time and those subjected to it can be shattered by the experience.  To argue that artillery do not have the ammunition reserves to maintain fire is often not accurate.

    Ivan,

    Units using cover and behaving tactically because they are being shot at is not the same as units being supressed.  The former is a tactical situation, while the latter is a forced situation and can severely limit what the unit can do, to the extent of making it inoperative.

    Jurgen

    in reply to: Suppression effects in infantry games #3544
    Jurgen Leistner
    Participant

    Suppression is indeed very difficult to model for units as not all members or parts of that unit will react to the perception of being on the wrong end of firepower in the same way.  One possibility might be to allow a certain percentage of the unit’s firepower to be used effectively based on a die roll against the Tapferkeit (or similar) rating, with modifiers based on the unit’s situation (what sort of fire are they under, what sort of cover are they in).

    As an example,

    A unit has a Tapferkeit rating 0f 5, so perhaps has the following chances on a D10:

    1-5 no firing

    6-7: 20% effectiveness

    8-9: 30% effectiveness

    10+: 40% effectiveness

    Modifiers to the dice role could be:

    In hard cover: +1

    In the open: -2

    Under sustained MG fire: -2

    etc

    Jurgen

    in reply to: WWI over the next 4 years? #3538
    Jurgen Leistner
    Participant

    I have never really considered doing the EWK but, if I did, I would agree with dhauser that the early months in the East would be interesting as there was plenty of movement and a vast range of troop types.

    Jurgen

    in reply to: Suppression effects in infantry games #3537
    Jurgen Leistner
    Participant

    Suppression is a reaction to firepower where the people who believe that they are on the receiving end of the firepower become unable to move or react in a useful manner; it is not the same as “going to ground”, which is a tactic.

    As to trading off hits for suppression in a wargame, I can see the logic behind this; given that our little metal or plastic men do not have fears and views and we cannot know what they are feeling, it can represent a target unit hiding as still as possible behind cover rather than engaging in combat, which carries an apparently greater risk of being shot.

    In our rules, figures test for suppression if they just survive being shot at or or blown up; the test is based on their “<span class=”gt-card-ttl-txt” style=”direction: ltr;”>Tapferkeit</span>” rating.  We are going to explore the “trading off” idea.

    Jurgen

    in reply to: IGOUGO or not #3536
    Jurgen Leistner
    Participant

    Our ultra-modern infantry rules are essentially IGOUGO, with individual figures or groups of figures being activated by the draw of their card.  However, while they are doing whatever they are doing, opposing figures can interrupt if their status allows them to do so.

    IGOUGO has its faults, but I feel that simultaneous activity can often result in chaos.

    Jurgen

    in reply to: Rapid Deployment rules? #3533
    Jurgen Leistner
    Participant

    I will have to take a look at these; I assume that the final version will include Chinese vehicles equipment.

     

    Jurgen

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)