Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Black Tree would like your help #13887

    Goliad
    Participant

    Hi, I’ll raise a long shot suggestion of Hungarians or Romanians.

    in reply to: Rules for the 45? Recommendations? #8088

    Goliad
    Participant

    As an out of left field idea, I am considering buying “Victorian Steel” Colonial rules to see if they would work for the ’45. Reading some of the descriptions and AARs of regulars┬átaking on armies of mixed composition, using some interesting mechanisms have piqued my interest.

    in reply to: Canaanites and Sea Peoples #5449

    Goliad
    Participant

    Great unit. I like the base – I am a firm convert to big bases as they let you tell a story with your miniatures if you want, or really pack them in to really convey mass.

    in reply to: Crampton's Gap 1862 #4170

    Goliad
    Participant

    Very nice looking game. I don’t live too far from the South Mountain passes so nice to see the battle on the tabletop. Another Union victory wasted by McClellan! What did you think about the Longstreet rules? I am thinking about buying them. From what I read I did not think they had skirmish/open order formations but it looks like you have a Union unit deployed in open order.

    in reply to: 28mm Goths #4007

    Goliad
    Participant

    Thanks everyone. I like diorama bases because my figures usually spend more time in the cabinet than on the table! I like seeing the”massed ranks” other can put on a table but I have enough trouble painting the 5 – 7 I put on a big base …

    Huber – yes it is a Sassanid figure but made by Eureka miniatures as part of their small Dark age range. The Ostrogoths negotiated with the Sassanids during the Gothic war to open a new front against Justinian so maybe this is a Sassanid “advisor”.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)