Forum Replies Created

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 45 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: On Canister! #177360
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    The Shuvalov “secret howitzer” and the Danilov-designed ‘unicorn’ were two different guns, with only the latter enjoying a long service life.

    For a different discussion of canister, including how the Russians resolved their canister issues, see  Alexander Zhmodikov’s comments at Page 85 of this issue of the “Smoothbore Artillery Journal”: https://www.napoleon-series.org/military-info/OrdnanceJournal/Issue7/SOJ-07_Part3_Weights.pdf .

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Well, that was odd #175865
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Seems like the site is back up at its same location now:  https://kiver.000webhostapp.com/allfacings.html .

    All’s well, then.

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Well, that was odd #175758
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Jonathan, it appears your site has been taken off-the-air again . . . any news you can share?

    https://kiver.000webhostapp.com/index.html

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Epic, waterloo epic. #168037
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    They look brilliant, Truls!  I hope your legendary stamina can carry you through this massive project–but what a great start!

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Women Figs for use in The Silver Bayonet #167224
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Brigade Games (USA) have a “Civilian Lady on a Horse” in their Napoleonic range: https://www.brigadegames.com/Napoleonic_c_278.html . The dress style should please your lady’s costume sensibilities.

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: French line battalion. #148665
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Time well spent, Truls!

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Definition of troop #145624
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Always appreciate your updates, Jonathan.

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Black Powder gaming aids. #145125
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Thanks for sharing, Tony!

    Bryce Allen

    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Sorry I was unable to provide what you wished for these two brothers, as I did not understand the original question to be addressing ‘succession protocol’.  Perhaps Jonathan can shed more light?

    Bryce Allen

    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Bump for The Bandit, in case this was missed.

    Bryce Allen

    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Jonathan will no doubt be along shortly . . . in the meantime, if you refer to the Borodino OOB researched by Alex Mikaberidze (http://www.napoleon-series.org/military/battles/1812/Russia/Borodino/Mikaberidze/OrdersofBattle/c_MikaberidzeOOB1.html) you find the 12th Division’s commander listed as “Major General Illarion Vasilchikov I”, and the 3rd Brigade IV Cavalry Corps commander as “Colonel Dmitry Vasilchikov II”.

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Russian Napoleonic Army Temptation #111666
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Go Russian . . . you know you want to!

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: 13th Light Battery – Russian 1812 #107936
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Actually, Grizz they are overcoats (shinels in Russian) rather than blankets, which were handy for deflecting slashing swords when enemy horsemen closed to hand-to-hand range.  But mostly, Alan Perry sculpted them on the figures, so I had to paint them. 

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Russian cavalry officers and NCOs #97390
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    No, the horsehair crests of the later helmet style (Dragoons & Cuirassiers) went to all ‘black’, with only trumpeters distinguished by an all red crest.  Jonathan will undoubtedly be along shortly to clarify . . .

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: My Russian Napoleonic page II #95571
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Yes, 1812 Hussars.  Many thanks for your continuing efforts, Jon–much appreciated!

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: My Russian Napoleonic page II #95486
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Thanks for the ongoing updates!  Hussars are next on the painting desk, and I’ll be curious to see if your LPK sources have introduced any new information.

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Question: French limber and caisson personel #77391
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    In several respects, Jonathan, I think you’ve answered your own question in the posts above.  As with other questions of organisations and ‘organizational behaviour’, I think you’re implying the divergence in approaches is down to economic ‘enablement’.  In the feudal command economy of 18th and early 19th-century Russia, we know there were no ‘free agents’ to separately bid for or deliver transport and logistical services to the artillery arm (even had these not already been fully integrated with the military by Catherine’s era).  Every non-noble was somebody else’s serf (belonging to, and at the command of, a specific noble, or owned by the State) and both serfdom and military service were lifelong affairs.  There was no unfettered supply-side market accessible, unlike the mercantile, early-capitalist situation in western Europe, where hauliers and carriage services were already well-established from the earliest days of colonial expansion and mercantilism.

    The only non-military external supply element required by the integrated Russian artillery, in order to kick-off a new campaign, was that of the Tsar’s ministers ordering the provision of additional horses to bring the ‘motor pool’ up to full strength (including ‘spares’)—a process of ‘tendering’ negotiated between those nobles owning the largest stud-farms, and the Tsar’s ministers (with the usual vagaries of royal patronage determining the ‘price’).  By contrast, the largely bankrupt Bourbon and other (non-British) monarchies of western Europe were under pressure to reduce their operating debts by not engaging transport contractors for their ‘un-integrated’ artillery arms (until compelled to do so by events); a choice ‘enabled’ by the availability of transport services in the civilian sector.  The subsequent post-Revolutionary French militarization of the various ‘train’ organisations seems to have been more driven by functional military imperatives (e.g., to improve battlefield ‘outcomes’) than by economics.

    Bryce Allen

    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    All good and back to it’s usual brilliant format, Jonathan–many thanks!

    Bryce Allen

    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Sadly, as of 09:45 GMT today, your site was still inaccessible–so much for the 1 hour cycle.  Taking a ‘page’ from the TMP playbook?

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Russian guns, limbers and caissons #76426
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    I used the Wargames Foundry Napoleonic Russian Artillery triad (with some additional washes), which came as like so:

    Bryce Allen

    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Azov Musketeer battalion #73007
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Agreed, Reese’s plates contain many, many errors.  The best of modern updated/translated scholarship is to be found on Jonathan Gingerich’s site: http://zaotlichiye.net63.net/allfacings.html . Flag staff colours, drumstick colours, pompons, sword knots, shoulder straps, etc. for all eras of the Napoleonic period.

    Terrific painting!

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Image Test Topic #64883
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Testing . . .

    Bryce Allen

    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    That’s quite a conundrum, Jonathan, but there’s no denying the data is a fascinating subject.  In terms of ‘format’ for the presentation, it would probably be the greatest service to other researchers if you could present the material in two clearly distinct parts:  1) the ‘facts’ you have discovered (warts and all); and 2) your analysis, hypotheses, and ‘explanations’ for the contradictions, omissions, etc., in a separate section, to avoid others conflating the two.  Very much appreciate you sharing your efforts to date, and am looking forward to more whenever available.

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: My Russian Napoleonic page #57062
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    General Slade may wish to revisit an old posting by ‘Seroga’ on The Miniatures Page, regarding “Russian Colour Parties”: http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=265911 .

     

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Looking for information on Möckern, April 1813 #50226
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    The closest I can find at this time, is from George Nafziger’s  collection: http://www.cgsc.edu/CARL/nafziger/813ECC.pdf

    Since the battle of Lützen occurs only one month after the action you specify, why would you think there would be time for a massive re-organisation on the Russian side?

    Hope it helps.

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: French Light Cavalry 1813 #48971
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Seeing those old Irregular figures, with the single-pose horses reminds us to be thankful that in recent times we have the Perry brothers to offer other choices.

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Russian Horse Jaeger Uniforms #45326
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    From Viskovatov, see Mark Conrad’s translation to English here: http://marksrussianmilitaryhistory.info/V11/V11.htm#hj

    For greater clarity and updates, see Jonathan Gingerich’s fine reference page here: http://zaotlichiye.net63.net/allfacings.html (scroll way down).

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Russian Jaeger figures – anyone make them? #44528
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Not that I am aware of Jonathan.  If you were seeking to go in the direction of 28mm figures, then the plastic musketeers and grenadier figures of Warlord or Perry would seem to be the easiest to modify to achieve the ’empty bayonet scabbard’ result.

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Gayda and Krijitsky #42174
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Sadly, I do not have a personal copy of LPK–thankfully, your web-page updates give us a ‘window’ to it.

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Gayda and Krijitsky #42117
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Thanks for the clarification, Jonathan.  Your page remains a wonderful resource!

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: My Russian Napoleonic page #39921
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    I’m also interested in the answer to Janner’s query, as I’ve seen similar ‘vague’ information regarding hussar pompon colours.  Further, where most line hussars appear to be portrayed with pompons matching the shako cord/lace colour (e.g. O.K. Parkhaev’s plates), the Guard Hussars have yellow outer rings and red centres ?

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: 6mm Russians #39602
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Thank you for the clarity, sir.   Working in the 28mm scale, I have to wrestle with other difficult choices to get the ‘effect’ desired, and for my sins they come out looking like so:

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: 6mm Russians #39553
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    As usual, remarkable painting at this scale!

    I note the Foot Artillery crew figures appear to have ‘white’ buttons on coat fronts and cuffs, rather than ‘brass’ ones.  A case of artistic licence necessary to render sufficient ‘contrast’ at 6mm scale?  (I’m curious, as I typically only paint 28mm scale.)

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: Early Russian Hussars #31806
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Your updates are always much appreciated, Jonathan.

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: 3e régiment de cuirassiers #25438
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Very pretty indeed, Stephen–probably your best to date–the trumpeter’s grey is particularly tasty!

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: French Guard at Borodino #21468
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Bandit, there is no ‘disjuncture’ here:  it’s a case of official chain of command versus actual battlefield deployment.  Mikaberidze’s account confirms that although Davout had five infantry divisions under his command, the 1st Division of Morand, and the 3rd Division of Gérard were ‘detached’ to Eugene’s IV Corps.  After Delzon’s 13th Division opened with the battle with the attack around the north of Borodino village, Morand (with to Delzon’s right), with Gérard immediately behind in support, made the initial advance on the Rayevsky redoubt. Grouchy’s cavalry was to the right and behind Gérard.

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: French Guard at Borodino #21425
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Try The Napoleon Series, OOB by Alex Mikaberidze (whose book on the Battle of Borodino you might be familiar with): http://www.napoleon-series.org/military/battles/1812/Russia/Borodino/Mikaberidze/OrdersofBattle/c_MikaberidzeOOB2.html .

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: More Russian Details #19236
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Jonathan, I’ve used your page as a key resource and reference in building my Russian project (7th Infantry Division – 1812) over many years, and especially appreciate you on-going commitment to continuously updating your information with new research.  

    Bryce Allen

    in reply to: 2nd Battalion, Badajoz Volunteer Line Regiment #18239
    Avatar photoGreystreak
    Participant

    Well done, Jono.  As you imply, they do not paint themselves.

    Bryce Allen

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 45 total)