Forum Replies Created

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 155 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Thank you for asking, Sid.  I replied on YouTube as well.  Katie is correct: there are no absolute weapon ranges (I detest such things!).  You roll your Facebook dice, and try to beat the range, plus Armour, plus cover, to the target.  For each dice group that succeeds, you get one hit.  If you just follow the rules in the book, you should work it out, so I’ll not update the questions.

    Regards,

    Robey

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Q. In the wording for the stealth suite upgrade for mechs, it refers to “opposing mechs”.  Should this be “opposing elements”?

    A. Yes, it should.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    The first question is answered.  The second question is answered by the first.  The third question refers to a rules currently in beta-testing, so I won’t provide an answer in the OP, but you’re right: it should be possible to take all-drone/robot armies.  I think in my head I’d already changed those to free upgrades to some extent, so I’ll review it for the final version.

    Main delay to finalizing a lot of these rules is that I want to illustrate them properly with painted miniatures, but I don’t own suitable miniatures…

    in reply to: Boreas give away! #49837
    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    I’d write a supplement for Horizon Wars allowing players to take superheavy tanks with transport bays.  No, wait.  I already did that!  Damn.

    Well, in honour of the fact that it looks a bit like a hovercraft, I’d use it to playtest and illustrate my rules for landing craft and other “routes to battle” that I’m writing rules for at the moment to go into the Operation Plantagenet expansion.  I love the idea of this baby ploughing up a beach, laying down brutal firepower on enemy positions before going firm and unleashing a P3 mech from the back to go stomping further up the beachhead.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Where’s your FLGS, McKinstry?  I’m always keen to know where people are enjoying HW, in case I can send some practical appreciation their way.

    R.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Updated.  Yes, they can.  It’s an exception to the “if F=0, you can’t shoot” consequence of reaching F0.  But the element still counts as being ineffective.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Yes, they can.  OP updated.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    On the grounds that that isn’t really a question, I won’t update the OP. However, if you’re foolish enough to let sci-fi infantry, with their fancy short range anti-armour weapons get closer enough to charge your mechs and tanks then you deserve everything you get.

    😉

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Nice. I really like the alt-historical use of the rules. I’ll give more detailed feedback once the competition is finished.

    R.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Updated 16 August 2016.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Fairly sure everyone did, Mike.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    OK, let’s look at the AA question first.

    No, in principle there’s no reason not to give the AA upgrade to non-mech elements for house-rule purposes.  It’s not an option for them in the rules because dedicated anti-aircraft elements have no good reason for being involved in battles that are supposed to represent the “big hand/small map”, Cold War style of open warfare.  Review the use of AA elements in history and you’ll find that they are positioned in the rear echelon to protect logistical assets or on the home front to defend against enemy strategic strikes.

    However, I recognized that people would want them in the game, so I added rules for mechs to be upgraded to AA elements.  Mechs are wacky, experimental elements to begin with, so it isn’t so odd to find them on the front line.  But it also means that there’s a hint there for people who want to design fixed AA batteries or AA conventional elements for home-made scenarios representing the defence of the logistical rear echelon.

    As for tac-nukes…

    I really decline to believe in any such thing, even at 2mm or 3mm.  A nuke is a strategic asset, and there’s plenty of evidence to illustrate that being behind hard cover isn’t going to save your arse from the effects of having all the air sucked from your lungs and replaced with molten, radioactive dust.

    However, given that this is *your* fictional universe, feel free to have nukes operate differently (or call them something else).  Still, for an example of why you might not want to unleash a strategic asset on a tactical battle, I would refer you to Warhammer 40k 2nd Edition and the thing of beauty that was the vortex grenade.  It’s not that you can’t write rules that will work or that you couldn’t make an argument for the presence of such a monstrosity in your army list.  It’s that doing so is basically creating a honking great fun vacuum that will render your (or your opponent’s) carefully planned strategy and finely judged tactical decisions null and void, because someone decided to press the big red middle finger button.

    If you want to embed nukes into your game’s idiom (to use your word, because it’s a *good* word), I’d recommend making it part of the game’s situation: this battle takes place immediately *after* a nuclear strike, so everyone’s in full CBRN mode, running around in Noddy suits.  The terrain would all become treacherous.  All buildings would be ruins and hazardous.  Infantry would lose its Alert ability (due to the Noddy suits).

    That’s my thoughts, for what they’re worth.

     

     

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Not so much a rules question, but:

    I seemed to have a much stronger force then my opponent who just chose Mechs and Conventional forces.  A  Conventional Force CHQ can take Mechs as well – no other restrictions?

    Obviously, it depends a bit on what conventional forces your opponent took.  But mechs really are very good.  If a mech-heavy force can’t win against a force with no mechs, then someone isn’t designing or using his mechs properly.

     

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Updated 23 July 2016

    in reply to: Painting Power Armour #45131
    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    For an effective digicam/MTP effect, use a sponge and apply blotches of dark brown, pale green and black over a dark green base.  Each new layer should be applied more lightly than the previous one.  Pick out weapons in black, visors in yellow or blue and bare faces in flesh tones.  Wash the whole with a dark brown wash.  Quick and surprisingly good-looking.  I’ll try to post an example later.

    R.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Yes! Me. I treat the little mini tank bases as heavy infantry. Otherwise, out works pretty well. Airships aren’t covered very well by the game, but you can just about get by using the super-heavy supplement.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    I guess this is one of those times when I look at my own design work and just have to accept that I did a poor job of executing a good idea.

    I played various versions of this scenario and tweaked them as I went in response to experience.  Reading over it now, I would make three simple adjustments to make the game balance better.

    The first is – yes – to restrict the “only one order per turn” for the civilians to the Patrol version of the game (with a 2′ wide board, an 8″ move per turn is plenty!).  The second is to change the “W” on the table size to “L”.  The third is to reduce the table size for a Squadron to 6’x4′.  Of course, the key issue is how far civilians can move per turn, not the size of the respective opposing forces.

    That said, I would also emphasize the tactical advice given in the rulebook.  The defender’s best solution to having civilians die too quickly is not to let them move on their own.  Surround them with  punchy protectors to block LOF (two per civvie element will usually be enough), make good use of cover and aggressively close with enemy elements.  Charging is a very good option for the defender, because the critical thing is to degrade the attacker’s ability to close with and kill the civilians.  The massive damage that a good charge can inflict will often be enough to either crush movement or firepower – either of which is a good option for the defender.

     

     

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    they look good. Only comment to make is that you need to separate the Mv and Mb for your aircraft. Different rules affect each, so they need to be individually stated.

     

    R.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Annoyingly, I wrote a blog article about this but it got lost in the transition to my new website.  We’re in the process of recovering it.

    Bascially, the broad doctrines of mechanized infantry are covered either by Mobile Infantry or by using a combination of Light Cavalry and Light Infantry.

    There are no battlefield taxis in Horizon Wars.

    R.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    strictly-speaking, just mechs. This is due to how upgrades are bought for conventional elements (using CR), which would mean you would have to upgrade all the elements of that type to all be squadron commanders, which doesn’t make any sense at all.

     

    But if you felt inclined to experiment, I’d be interested to hear the results.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Yes.  That’s an embarrassing editing failure in text copied from MechaWar material.  For “mech” read “element”.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    A lot of reasons.

    The D value represents, amongst other things, an element’s organic support assets.  It’s a lot easier to give integral or close support to an infantry squad than it is to a tank.  If a soldier loses his rifle or a radio, another one can be handed up the line very quickly (and the sergeant major will pencil in a severe bollocking to the offender, if he or she survives to receive it).  But if a tank so much as throws a track – a comparatively quick and simple fix – it will still usually have to wait until the battle is finished before it can be addressed.

    It also represents that whilst infantry are squishy – only A1 in some cases – they possess a different kind of resilience to mere armour that comes from the fraternity of a battle squad.

    Less poetically, it’s also a balancing mechanic.  But I wouldn’t have used this as a reason if I hadn’t already felt that the true resilience of combat infantry was accurately represented by a high D stat.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    It seems to be a good rounded out ruleset. Me and my mates are mustering forces (old space marine and epic minis) and looking forward to the first games. Am I right in the assumption, that it is not intended for the CAV to get rid of the vanguard rule (by command recources upgrade)?

    Not only not intended, but also not implied, suggested, hinted at or otherwise permitted.  If you want a tank to not have the Vanguard upgrade, take a mech.

    Am I assuming right, that a conventional element can get more than one command recources upgrade?

    No reason it can’t.  Saw someone dump 8 CR into two elements yesterday.  Now that was a recon element from nightmares!

    R.

    in reply to: Final preparations for Horizon Wars #41136
    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    A glut of HW AARs?  Ooh, I do hope so!

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Yes, D is not an active stat. It’s ability to help you repair is already degraded by your damage track.

    R.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Thaddeus – yes, although it’ll be fairly useless before then. Plus, critical hits will usually see for a seriously damaged element long before that point.

    Also, there is an oft-overlooked rule covering “ineffective” elements that applies in several missions.

     

     

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Faster, more resilient, more flexible.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    The definition of what constitutes a “mech” is somewhat loose. But I don’t mind saying that just running up some “mech” stats for a non-mech and calling it a mech isn’t really in the spirit of the game.

    Of course, don’t let me tell you how to play! But without being technical about it, there are thematic reasons why conventional elements are built differently to mechs.

     

    that said, the super heavy expansion gives rules for building super tanks at P4+.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Just a reminder that the Horizon Wars Facebook page is the best place for regular updates, FAQs, clarifications and a heads-up on new material coming soon for Horizon Wars:

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/1087742501257769/

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    define “afternoon”.

     

    if you’ve got three or four hours to play, you could comfortably play up to battalion level. That’s three companies of three platoons of three elements, plus support, so 30-ish?

     

    R.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    playing in cm is definitely a way to approach the 2mm game if playing on a 2×2 board or smaller. If you want a “grand sweep of battle” game, though, play it in inches over a 4’x6′.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    for sheer value, EM4 is untouchable. And mechs are tricky. One of the reasons I wrote MechaWar in the first place was to have a cheap game I could play with cheap mechs, and there was a serious dearth of cheap mechs and still is.

     

     

    However, there are now a couple of new options. Sayiner Microtoys is a little Turkish company that’s just getting started, but they are collaborating with a Canadian designer to put some really nice-looking mechs on the market. If the prices of their current range is anything to go by, you can expect great value. Not EM4 value, but close.

     

    The other one to watch is Brigade Models. They have been re-tooling their 15mm range and are now replicating that across their 6mm stuff. Their 15mm mech has yet to appear in 6mm, but I’m told it is coming. And as their value has always been amazing, I expect that to continue.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    I’ll be at Salute on the Osprey booth with boxes of copies to sign and sell. I think I’ll be at the booth from the start for about an hour, after which I’ll be wandering around. I should have my “demo kit in a bag” with me, so I’ll try to find a quiet corner or cafe table to run games during and after the event.

    R.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    That’s exactly correct, Mike.

     

     

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xs5o7KewpE0

     

    Playthrough video is up, just in time for the big pre-release at Salute this weekend!!!

    R.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Author interview for Osprey Games:

    https://youtu.be/kcY-xDw2vYY

    R.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    It has been described by others as being like a skirmish game, but not like KR16 is a skirmish game: more that it plays with a similar pace and urgency to a 28mm skirmish game.

    R.

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    Ah, right.

    Yes, you’ll find the rules for designing your own mechs will make specialist mechs perfectly feasible. Your VOTOMs sound like high M, high D, low F, A1, perhaps with an upgrade like stealth suite, jump frame or a shooting upgrade.

     

     

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant
    1. No, but I’ve played it solo many times during development. There’s almost no “hidden” info.
    2. Not sure what you mean. It’s a wargame with mechs in it. If you want your mechs to be smaller, either they can be little mechs or they can be big heavy infantry or some other conventional element.

     

     

    Robey Jenkins
    Robey Jenkins
    Participant

    I ran a demo for a local group the other night which went brilliantly.

    I’ve spotted a couple of errata points, but they’re comparatively minor and easily fixed.

    R.

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 155 total)