Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 241 through 260 (of 260 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Question and Blog post #14847
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    I’ve rebased some figures/vehicles several times as my butterfly-like focus wanders from system to system. I hate doing it, but I’ve resigned myself to going with the flow… besides, if those square bases are stopping you from playing toy soldiers, there’s your answer!

    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    Tempest, does the author give examples of what he’s talking about? I’m wondering if cultural impacts on military doctrine have diminished over time, and if they’re likely to effectively disappear with continuing globalisation, among regular forces anyway.

    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    I bought these rules last week, and I can’t wait to get the time to try them out… flippin’ “holidays”!! I’d been sussing out what I have suitably based in 1/300, but 1/600 looks good. I hadn’t realise the Fivecore supplements were applicable to the company rules… money could be spent this night.

    I like the design philosophy of NWG rules. I’d got NEIS, but they were a bit complex for me (I know they’re not exactly complicated, but I’m very simple), the Company Command rules are spot on. I smiled at the suggestion in the rules that a cuppa might be necessary before you read on in the “vehicles” section, but when I’d thought through the possibilities for tank-on-tank engagements I think they’ll work well.

    Thanks for the AAR!

    in reply to: Film Quiz #13727
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    I liked the first Mad Max, apart from the soundtrack which seemed to have been piped in from another film.

    For me, no PA list is complete without mentioning a film I haven’t seen since I was a child, and that scared me so much I was afraid to go to sleep, namely; Threads.

     

    in reply to: KR-16 Campaign game 1 #13717
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    Nice AAR, thanks. I think limiting grenades/molotovs is a good idea – a lot of that game took place at VERY close range – even vehicle vs vehicle.

    in reply to: Film Quiz #13714
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    Are there naturally occurring cakes? TGBBO would be vastly improved with Paul and Mary trapped down a mine. Not Mel though, I couldn’t allow that.

    Is it Ronald Reagan’s finest work, “Bedtime for Bonzo”?

    in reply to: Tumbling Dice 1/2400th Pre-Dreadnoughts #13376
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    I guess that’ll be the case for quite a few people, and in that respect it’s perhaps a strange choice to kick off a new range. Then again, I suppose it’s the big seller in this period.

    I’d like to see some Sino-Japanese and Spanish-American war ships, plus a few Turkish and Russian ironclads in the Victorian range wouldn’t go amiss! Despite the difference in price, I’ve been won over by the slightly chunkier 1/2400 for this period, cf. 1/3000.

    in reply to: Tumbling Dice 1/2400th Pre-Dreadnoughts #13358
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    There are none to be seen! It’s like the olden days, only online.

    I’ve bought most of my TD collection in such circumstances, and I’ve not been disappointed. I’ll choose what I’m ordering this weekend and post the barenaked metal pics on here.

    in reply to: Naval and Air Forums #13205
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    I’ve been trying to think of a way of subliminally encouraging Mike to change his mind… but I can’t.

    So I’ll just say that I tend to think of naval warfare of one era having more in common with naval warfare of a different era than it does with the land warfare of the same era.

    If that stunner of an argument doesn’t convince, then I’ll fold!

    in reply to: Naval and Air Forums #13168
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    Yeah, I think separate naval and air forums would be a good idea. Now’s the time to do it while the site’s still young. I understand proliferation of fora(?) might be a concern, but it’s not exactly excessive. Plus, I love ironclads.

    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    Very interesting tank numbers quoted there – given the ancient stuff that’s turned up in Syrian and Ukrainian arms sumps in recent years it’s possible those figures are conservative!

    The T-55’s a favourite of mine too. I remember taking a walk round the Imperial War Museum circa 1992 and seeing an Iraqi T-55 through the railings somewhere round the back of the building. They’d an explanatory notice on the railings detailing how this model of tank was obsolete and only really useful against similarly equipped enemy forces and insurgents. Which was probably true, but I certainly didn’t expect to see them featuring prominently in wars more than two decades later.

    My only interest in modern gaming relates to imagi-nation scenarios and not-a-chance “what ifs”, but this kind of report really does provide “justification” for who has what equipment and where they got it from…

    in reply to: How small would you go? #13022
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    For some of us it’s a matter of available space. I’m not into ancient-period gaming, but  3mm figures on a 2′ square playing surface makes perfect sense!

    in reply to: Coronel refought #12995
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    Bummer about the Canopus. That old tub’s one of my favourite ships. Very interesting “what if” though!

    Haven’t seen it, but apparently worth a look:

     

    http://www.bfi.org.uk/whats-on/bfi-film-releases/battles-coronel-falkland-islands

     

    in reply to: Engaged Again #12058
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    I’ve just finished reading David Brin’s first Uplift trilogy and it’s put me in the mood for a bit of starship combat. This looks like it might be fun, and not a bad price at ten quid for a hard copy.

    in reply to: 6mm compound terrain – wip #12057
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    Very useful tutorial, I must get some of that sand texture gel, it looks handy. Must get some of those pick-ups too one of these weeks.

    in reply to: Popular Genres #11437
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    I felt the need to elaborate as “using Pieces of Eight” seemed so decadent. But then I’ve had a hard day at work and am in that exhausted state of mind that’s almost trippy

    in reply to: Popular Genres #11435
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    Modern 1/600 using Pz8, Combat 1948 and KR16

    Ironclad era using Iron and Fire, Hammerin Iron

    Age of Sail using Pieces of Eight (rules, not coinage)

    1920s/30s with USE ME Chthulu version

    Post-Holocaust(ish) with KR16

    Think that’s the lot recently. Although most of those are “historical”, it’s always in an imagi-nation setting. No idea about the popularity of the above as I’m a solo gamer of near hermit status.

     

     

     

     

    in reply to: AB's 6mm sci-fi topic #11276
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    Great news, looks like a very useful range you’re planning. Speaking of resin scenery, any plans for a watch tower for Stonehaven?

    in reply to: AB's 6mm sci-fi topic #11256
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    Erm, well yes, flak vests would be OK… are you seriously planning on adding to your infantry range? I was going to add a “jump to it!”, but thought that might be a bit cheeky for a first post!

    I reckon heavy weapon as the specialist, rather than a medic, I’d probably never use the fella, with all due respect to Private Godfrey.

    in reply to: AB's 6mm sci-fi topic #11254
    Avatar photoRules Junkie Jim
    Participant

    OK, I’ll bite…

    I’d like to see some “colonial militia” type infantry in 6mm. Little or no body armour, maybe helmets but more likely caps. Perhaps slightly dishevelled. I’d also like to see cavalry.

     

Viewing 20 posts - 241 through 260 (of 260 total)